1a) The trait I have chosen is the mammalian forelimb. Two
species in particular would be human beings, who are land-dwelling, upright
bipeds, and sea lions, which are a marine, and thus swimmer, species (though
they can surface for periods of time).
1b) The human forelimb has an extended humerus as compared
to the sea lion, as well as a longer ulna. Carpal structure is also similar,
but the metacarpals and phalanges of humans are relatively short, however
separated. The sea lion metacarpals and phalanges appear to be longer but
connected and to function more as a whole unit, as opposed to the human digits
that can function independently of the others.
These traits exhibit differences between the two species
because of the environments in which the species evolved. Though there is a
similar ancestor, human beings ultimately ended up on land and walking upright
led us to find uses for our hands. Sea lions use their forelimbs are flippers
that propel them through water. The different environmental pressures drove the
two different forelimbs to evolve to serve two different, but similar,
purposes.
1c) A common ancestor between sea lions and humans would
have been a placental mammal that was probably a quadruped that lived either by
land or sea. The mammalian forelimb was present in some of the oldest known
mammals (up to around 200 mya) and was likely a feature that evolved differently
after different speciation events. The latest common ancestor between sea lions
and humans would have been around 80-100 mya.
2a) The analogous trait I have chosen is the eye. Two
species that posses eyes but have no homologous relation are humans and
octopuses. Humans, again, are land dwelling creatures, octopi are marine
creatures.
2b) Both eye structures have an eyelid, a cornea, a pupil,
and a lens that focuses the light onto the retinal cells coating the rear of
the eye. There are also receptor cells, also on the rear of the eye, that
collect and send this information via the optic nerve, again at the rear of the
eye structure. There are similarities between these structures because both of
these species adapted to the benefits of being able to see (process light
information). Primitive photosensitive structures on ancestors of either
species likely mutated slowly in order to see clearly (somewhat) in varying
conditions.
2c) Given that the last common ancestor between humans and
octopuses lived hundreds of millions of years ago, it is unlikely that a common
ancestor would have had eyes. This time period contains some of the most
primitive animals, and eye structures are some of the most complex evolved
structures known to biology. It is possible that basic photosensitive structures
existed on the earliest animals, but nothing close to an eye.
Excellent discussion on the homologous trait. Thorough explanation of the structural and functional differences, along with the environmental pressures that produced them. Good identification of the ancestry as well.
ReplyDeleteGood work on the analogous trait as well. When it comes to ancestry, you are correct that the common ancestor existed long, long ago, and but is it crucial that the ancestor did or did not possess some type of eye? Or is it just important to know that these species developed their traits independently of each other through different evolutionary paths?
Great post.